The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Analysis of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the discourse on globalisation is regularly found at the intersection of contradictory views on freedom and equity. The work by the author Junon Moneta, far from being a pamphlet opposed to globalization itself, aims to redefine the boundaries of a new humanism through the filter of natural transfers according to the vision of Aristotelian philosophy. By critiquing synthetic interactions that support contemporary mechanisms of domination and vulnerability, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to reveal the failures of our global financial structure.
Historically, globalisation is not a modern process. Its beginnings can be identified back to the theories of the economist Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to amplify its international economic reach. Yet, what was once a commercial development strategy has converted into a instrument of subjugation by global finance, characterized by the rise of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief validated by most economists, Junon Moneta demonstrates that the economic model is in reality a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also covers the administration of the EU, perceived as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the power of an economic elite instead of protecting the interests of its citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations rather than by a citizen support, is questioned. The current deviations, notably financial and political, have only intensified the doubt of the writer about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
This thinker, while acknowledging the prior faults that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also proposes alternatives aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a human-centered and fair outlook. The urgent need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the entire discourse.
The text ventures more deeply into the analysis of the power structures that govern global economic exchanges. The analysis extends the way in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a restricted circle of financial influencers, frequently at the cost of the many. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated through entities like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The writer exposes how these organisms, claiming to monetary management and security, have throughout history controlled stock exchanges and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far removed from a emancipatory solution to old monetary restrictions, is described as a control mechanism, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the critic depicts the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that sidelined citizens from decision-making processes, while aggravating disparities between member countries within the Union.
The effects of these approaches translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, financial paralysis, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded living standards throughout Europe. The thinker emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the European Union remains vulnerable to potential disruptions, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the text calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly greater transparency in political decisions and real democratic participation that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
Source about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The thinker proposes that the key is in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.